If it now starts after fixing a bad vacuum hose but runs poorly, I’d treat that as “you found one leak, there may be more,” and agree AFR/vacuum is the most likely direction.Tom wrote: These CarBot answers are coming mostly from our no-start knowledge base, so it is giving pretty sound advice. Given your recent findings on the bad vacuum hose, and it subsequently starting but running poorly, I'd focus on ensuring the proper AFR, most likely vacuum related. When it runs, how much vacuum are you seeing at the FPR vacuum line, and what's the RPM. CC'ing to keep it up to speed and see what it things now.
At the FPR vacuum line specifically, you should see steady manifold vacuum at idle. If vacuum there is low, unstable, or near zero at idle, either the engine isn’t actually getting normal manifold vacuum (big leak, late cam timing, misfire) or the FPR line isn’t truly connected to manifold vacuum (wrong port, cracked hose, check valve issue, tee feeding something it shouldn’t). RPM matters because a high idle from a leak can still show some vacuum, but it’ll often be lower than expected and “fluttery.”
Practical next checks that usually pay off on a 951 after a hose failure are confirming the FPR and damper lines are routed correctly and not swapped, smoke testing the intake/charge system (including intercooler end tanks and all the small vacuum lines), and verifying the brake booster line and check valve. Also make sure the J-boot and all clamps between AFM and turbo inlet are tight, because unmetered air there can make it run terribly.
If you can post the idle RPM, the vacuum reading at the FPR line at idle, and whether it smooths out when you pinch off the ICV hose or brake booster hose, that will usually point right at the leak area.
